Content Policy
Site Content Editorial Policy
How legal content is written, reviewed and updated — so that what you read is well-founded, up to date, and under attorney responsibility.
The content on the site is intended to provide general information to the public. Before publishing or updating legal guides, the content is checked against relevant official or legal sources, and where necessary undergoes review by an attorney at the firm.
Who Writes the Content?
Legal content on the site is written by the firm's team or under the professional guidance of the firm's attorneys. Reviews of proceedings, guides and explanations are written based on the firm's practical experience in the relevant field.
Who Reviews the Content?
- Defined legal content is reviewed by an attorney at the firm before publication
- Content on legislation and case law is verified against the official source (law, regulation, judicial decision)
- Where there is doubt — the content is not published until clarified
How Are Sources Chosen?
We prefer official sources over secondary sources. When citing legislation or case law, we identify the source clearly. Sources we accept:
- Government and relevant institution websites (National Insurance, Ministry of Justice, Tax Authority)
- Official case law databases (Nevo, Psakdin, court websites)
- Israel Bar Association publications
- Primary and secondary legislation from the official law book
- "Kol Zchut" — for general civic reference, not as binding legal source
When Is Content Updated?
- Following changes in legislation or relevant regulations
- Following new and material case law in the field
- When a professional at the firm identifies inaccuracy or outdated information
- Following a public or client inquiry via the Content Corrections page
How Do We Fix Errors?
Every inquiry about incorrect information, missing source, or outdated content is examined. If a material error is found, we correct the content promptly and note the updated date on the page. We maintain an internal record of material corrections.
Use of AI Tools
We do not hide the fact that we use artificial-intelligence tools as writing and editing assistants — primarily for phrasing improvement, readability checks, and initial research support. No legal content is published on the site without human review by someone familiar with the field. On substantive matters — legislation, case law, procedure — review includes verification against the source.
Important. AI tools do not replace legal judgment. They are also not an independent source for legal information on the site. We treat them as editorial assistance, nothing more.
Content in Areas Handled in Cooperation
Some of the firm's practice areas are handled in cooperation with partner attorneys. Content describing a cooperation area is explicitly identified as the partner attorney's representation area, and is not presented as a self-handled area of the firm.
Content and Editorial Inquiries
Questions, correction requests or content suggestions — via the contact form or the Content Corrections page.
Last updated: May 2026